ethical
ah, aussie children's shows. wanna know when you should die (in all likelihood, kill yourself) to save the planet. here is a rough estimate calculator......
1 FaverShareViewed: 2 TimesGov. Ted Kulongoski insisted Thursday that federal regulators halt all reviews of proposals to build liquefiednaturalgas terminals in Oregon until they study all alternatives for supplying natural gas to the region. President Bush Calls for Economic Stimu ...
13 FaversShareViewed: 36 TimesA clearly written exploration of the science behind newly passed British legislation allowing for the creation of human-animal hybrid embryos (under specific conditions).
1 FaverShareViewed: 17 TimesQuoted: Birth, life, death and extinction: an evolutionary biologist's guide to natural selection.
1 FaverShareViewed: 6 TimesQuoted: Most firm administrators and managers know quite well what questions you can and can't ask in a job interview. But, increasingly they are making an ...
If you're a skeptical kind of person, "neuromarketing" might be a better name for what's really going on here.
1 FaverShareViewed: 6 TimesQuoted: CNN is pushing the latest neuropunditry data on the 2008 presidential primaries. In a video segment that first aired this morning, reporter Randi Kaye tries to avert a replay of the New Hampshire polling fiasco by getting at what's going on inside the mind
Clinton's approach to democracy. Link from Tim.
Quoted: The Dallas Morning News gets hold of Clinton caucus "training materials," in which supporters are instructed to fight for procedural control of caucuses. The materials say:
"DO NOT allow the supporter of another candidate to serve in leadership roles."
"...If our supporters are outnumbered, ask the Temporary Chair if one of our supporters can serve as the Secretary, in the interest of fairness."
"The control of the sign-in sheets and the announcement of the delegates allotted to each candidate are the critical functions of the Chair and Secretary. This is why it is so important that Hillary supporters hold these positions."
2 FaversShareViewed: 5 TimesOn April 12, British Deaf people are marching against Clause 14 (4) (9) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill. The clause says that a British couple undergoing IVF *must* discard any deaf embryos, and instead choose a hearing embryo for implantation .
This is problematic for the Deaf community for two reasons: First, it takes away a Deaf couple's right (indeed, any person's right) to raise a Deaf child if they choose to use IVF technology. They view this as discriminatory and in violation of their reproductive rights. Second, and more globally, it opens the door to other frightening embryonic selection practices, such as selection against blacks, gays, or other racial, linguistic, or cultural minorities.
Oddly, IMO, high-ranking British newspapers are spinning this as the Deaf community's desire to have "designer" deaf babies. One might expect them to see the broader implications and take up the cause...but ignorance apparently has the day.
1 FaverShareViewed: 3 TimesRelated Content from Around Faves
business
-
Are we in the UK drowning in Debt? According to the insurer AXA, some 11.6 million people (25 per cent of the adult population) are said to be struggling financially with a significant number, around 1.3 million people, admitting their finances are ent...
4 Favers - Rosalva - 6 hours ago3 Favers
- Alberico9 - 21 hours ago7 FaversViewed: 3 Times
