1 - 10 of 31 Faves|
vote
12
Faved by: tsupo
Oct 07 2005 - via mk.zansu.com

これっていわゆる、Webアプリケーションのテストツール

2 FaversShareViewed: 9 Times
vote
19
Faved by: tsupo
Apr 12 2005 - via www.vbunit.com

vbUnit3 helps to write and run automated unit tests against Visual Basic and COM objects.

1 FaverShareViewed: 17 Times
vote
15
Faved by: tsupo
Apr 06 2005 - via homepage3.nifty.com

NUnit Converterは,JUnit Converterを.NET用に移植したものです.

1 FaverShareViewed: 13 Times
vote
33
Faved by: tsupo
Apr 06 2005 - via www.atmarkit.co.jp

ひと言でいえば、プログラマーが単体テスト用のテスト・プログラムを作成し、それを実行することを支援してくれるものである。

1 FaverShareViewed: 31 Times
vote
16
Faved by: tsupo
Sep 19 2005 - via d.hatena.ne.jp

ボトルネックを見つけるのに便利なプロファイラを作ってみた。

1 FaverShareViewed: 14 Times
vote
20
Faved by: tsupo
Apr 06 2005 - via www.divakk.co.jp

NDocでMSDN形式のドキュメントを作ると、ほとんど.NET Frameworkドキュメントと同じようなものが作れる

1 FaverShareViewed: 18 Times
vote
5
Faved by: tsupo
Apr 12 2005 - via www.nbrains.co.jp

開発者向けツールだけでなく、プロジェクト管理ツールも紹介

0 FaversShare
vote
41
Faved by: tsupo
Apr 06 2005 - via cppunit.sourceforge.net

CppUnit is a C++ unit testing framework.

2 FaversShareViewed: 39 Times
vote
47
Faved by: tsupo
Apr 06 2005 - via www.graphviz.org

Graphviz is open source graph visualization software. It has several main graph layout programs.

14 FaversShareViewed: 37 Times
vote
8
Faved by: mike
Apr 09 2007 - via www.codeplex.com

Jaybe introduced me to the Visual Studio Unit testing and "Test Driven Development" methodology. I can't say I agree with every aspect of TDD when carried to the extreme but there are some parts I like a lot:

- Write (failing) unit tests BEFORE writing your code. (But I think you do need to do some design work and object modeling before you can start the unit testing).
- Use code coverage to make sure you're getting very high % coverage of all your code before considering your tests complete.

Part I'm not so keen on is writing code that is a "stub" for the actual working system. It seems to me this leads to a lot of writing and re-writing of code that is going to get thrown away. If you're going to write the "minimum implementation" for getting your unit tests to pass, I still think this needs to be mostly NOT throw-away code. Otherwise, how is this making "progress"?

Quoted: The purpose of this project is to build some insightful and practical guidance around using Visual Studio Team System 2005. It's a collaborative effort between patterns & practices, VSTS team members, and industry experts.

3 FaversShareViewed: 6 Times

Page 1

Related Content from Around Faves

test

  • SharpSmith
    Jan 03 2008

    Better than not testing your code, and easier than creating testable code, TypeMock simplifies writing unit tests.

    * Enables testing code that was previously 'untestable'
    * Reduces time spent on writing unit tests, giving you more time to focus on your real tasks
    * Cuts development time and increases your efficiency by having repeatable unit test
    * Saves time by eliminating code refactoring and rewriting just to make it testable
    * Encourages developers to write unit tests

    1 FaverViewed: 7 Times
  • eric - Jun 27 2007
    3 FaversViewed: 99 Times
  • mark17 - 10 days ago
    1 FaverViewed: 2 Times
VIEW ALL

xunit

VIEW ALL