Faves for this Web page

  • CNN's response to Michael Moore

  • Sicko was eye opening, and I am happy I saw it. At the same time, I do appreciate that CNN is fact checking and then asking questions when they find something contradictory to what's presented in Sicko.

    Quoted: "It's ironic that someone who has made a career out of holding powerful interests accountable is so sensitive to having his own work held up to the light by impartial journalists, as we did in our examination of 'SiCKO,' " the spokesperson said.

    • btreloar - Jul 15 2007

      Seems to be a tempest in a teapot .. taking potshots at one another over relatively insignificant difference in numbers cited. Moore may be making a little extra PR for his film by complaining loudly, but that's probably just PR.

    • buggia - Jul 15 2007

      I think the issue is that CNN doesn't fact very many of its content. Just look at the number of times that Tony Snow has completely contradicted himself (or Lied) at a press briefing, and CNN does not "fact check" those instances, they simply report them as-is. The same can be said for about any political claim from either side of the isle about the war, the economy or healthcare.

      Why did they decide to start their fact checking with Moore's film?

    • matt - Jul 16 2007

      Dr. Sanjay Gupta (CNN health correspondant) seems to have taken a keen interest in this movie (as he probably should). He, specifically, likes to add his own take on things.

Add a Fave for this Web page

What happens when I press Publish?
Your Fave for this Web page gets shared with the Faves community. You can access it at any time by selecting "My Faves" from the menu above.
Why do you ask for my email address?
We use your email address to create an account, so you can easily find your Fave again at a later time.
Rate It

Separate each email address with a comma.
WE DO NOT SPAM | Please read our privacy policy.

Related Content from Around Faves

cnn

VIEW ALL

news

VIEW ALL