Faves for this Web page
- DataShare - Jul 20 2007 | data management, data sharing, JISC, project, disciplinary differences, articles, Edinburgh
Findings – The paper finds that significant support was expressed for the provision of bi-directional links between source and output repositories, tempered by a limited knowledge of repositories among the survey constituency and the need for reassurance on measures for the protection of data ownership. Diversity in the application of good data management practice is marked both between and within each of the disciplines surveyed, with solutions adopted characterised by a culture of self-sufficiency and the use of repositories driven by practical research requirements. Common areas for improvement have been recognised across the disciplines, notably in the processes described for the assignment of metadata, and opportunities for expert assistance in data management were identified.
Author(s): Graham Pryor
Journal: OCLC Systems & Services
ISSN: 1065-075X
Year: 2007 Volume: 23 Issue: 1 Page: 70 - 78
DOI: 10.1108/10650750710720775
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Add a Fave for this Web page
- What happens when I press Publish?
- Your Fave for this Web page gets shared with the Faves community. You can access it at any time by selecting "My Faves" from the menu above.
- Why do you ask for my email address?
- We use your email address to create an account, so you can easily find your Fave again at a later time.
Related Content from Around Faves
articles
-
1 FaverViewed: 4 TimesQuoted: A new study looks at what happens when a language doesn't have words for numbers
- X - Jun 03 20091 FaverViewed: 11 Times
- satantango - Oct 27 20081 FaverViewed: 18 Times
