Faves for this Web page

  • ms.kruse - Mar 05 2008 | Encarta, women

    Check out my update to the election guide -- it's very timely!
    How much do I love having free reign over this page?

    • SteveS - Mar 06 2008

      I salute Queen Melissa! Long may she rein. Or reign. :P

    • btreloar - Mar 06 2008

      Super page. I loved the article about nasty political campaigns in history.

    • mel - Mar 07 2008

      This is a telling stat: "In 1985, when the feminist political network Emily's List started tracking women's participation in government, only two women served in the U.S. Senate. It was still two in 1992. Now it's 16."

    • ms.kruse - Mar 07 2008

      Yeah, I'm still trying to decide if that's a positive or not. On the one hand, hurray for any increased representation. On the other hand, come on, there's 100 seats in the senate ... 16% is kind of small potatoes. But, maybe I'm not being realistic? After all, as recently as 1965 Washington women needed written permission from their husbands in order for the bank to allow them to use their checkbooks. 1965!

    • mel - Mar 08 2008

      That was my thinking. I mean, only two in the power-woman 1980s?! Wow.

    • drew_s - Mar 09 2008

      Incumbency is a factor. Robert Byrd was in the Senate when women got the right to vote I think.

    • textured - Mar 16 2008

      hey nice guide. i like.

  • MSN Encarta Understanding Elections. Pretty Cool!

Votes for this web page

Add a Fave for this Web page

What happens when I press Publish?
Your Fave for this Web page gets shared with the Faves community. You can access it at any time by selecting "My Faves" from the menu above.
Why do you ask for my email address?
We use your email address to create an account, so you can easily find your Fave again at a later time.
Rate It

Separate each email address with a comma.
WE DO NOT SPAM | Please read our privacy policy.

Related Content from Around Faves

women

VIEW ALL

politics

VIEW ALL