OpenP2P.com: Piracy is Progressive Taxation, and Other Thoughts on the Evolution of Online DistributionFirst Faved : Mar 12 2007 by ericFaved : 2 times (1 with note)Viewed : 4 timesFave It!
Faves for this Web page
The 7 lessons of distribution for authors:
Quoted: 1) Obscurity is a far greater threat to authors and creative artists than piracy.
2) Piracy is progressive taxation.
3) Customers want to do the right thing, if they can.
4) Shoplifting is a bigger threat than piracy.
5) File sharing networks don't threaten book, music, or film publishing. They threaten existing publishers.
6) "Free" is eventually replaced by a higher-quality paid service.
7) There's more than one way to do it.- urbansheep - Aug 07 2006 | copyright, article, TimOReilly, p2p, imported:del.icio.us
Already a user? Sign In
Add a Fave for this Web page
- What happens when I press Publish?
- Your Fave for this Web page gets shared with the Faves community. You can access it at any time by selecting "My Faves" from the menu above.
- Why do you ask for my email address?
- We use your email address to create an account, so you can easily find your Fave again at a later time.
Related Content from Around Faves
copyright
-
1 FaverViewed: 2 TimesQuoted: Enact a content consumer's Bill of Rights: The US has slid much too far in the direction of protection of large corporate copyright holders,...
- samuel337 - Jul 25 20081 FaverViewed: 4 Times
- masuda - Jun 24 20091 FaverViewed: 3 Times

i'd agree except for #6 - i think "free" might be partially, but won't be entirely replaced by better-quality paid service. sharing won't eliminate the paying market, but it will cause it to shrink.
6 reads a bit funny to me too but I don't necessarily agree that free services cause the paying market to shrink in all situations. In fact, many of the articles I pointed to today in my little barrage of dots say that free distribution can "expand" the paying market.
This isn't a zero-sum game. There is a point at which it may not be as wise to give things away for free but I think for artists who are relatively obscure, it may be the way to build a paying audience - which is the point...
well, either way i'm all for free distribution. it may well be that it helps obscure artists (for whom i have a lot of sympathy) and hurts the big ones and their publishing/recording companies (for whom i have a lot less). in any case there's really no way to stop it, short of extreme levels of policing and regulation which would be bad in many, many ways.