Faves for this Web page
So do you need to install the .net 3.5 framework to run .net 3.5 assemblies, or will these assemblies work with .net 2.0?
Quoted: Yesterday I had a discussion on an internal Microsoft Developers meeting about the status of .NET 3.5. We had presented that .NET 3.0 is an extension of .NET 2.0, and not a new version. My statement that the status of .NET 3.5 is the same, it is basically .NET 2.0 with extra features, was received sceptically.
Just to prove I'm right, here my observations.
Votes for this web page
Add a Fave for this Web page
- What happens when I press Publish?
- Your Fave for this Web page gets shared with the Faves community. You can access it at any time by selecting "My Faves" from the menu above.
- Why do you ask for my email address?
- We use your email address to create an account, so you can easily find your Fave again at a later time.
Related Content from Around Faves
asp.net
-
Here is an MSDN article on the ASP.NET MVC framework from March.
3 FaversViewed: 11 TimesQuoted: ... a controller can be instantiated directly, and action methods called, without any additional infrastructure. You don't need an HTTP context, and you don't need a server, just a test harness.
...
the ASP.NET MVC Framework offers Web developers a new way to build Web applications in the Microsoft .NET Framework. The Framework is designed for testability, embraces HTTP instead of trying to abstract it away, and is extensible at just about every point. - jubith - Dec 07 20071 FaverViewed: 14 Times
- mohit - Jul 24 20081 FaverViewed: 12 Times