Oh freddled gruntbuggly: .NET 2.0 = .NET 3.0 = .NET 3.5First Faved : Jul 24 2008 by mohitFaved : 1 time with noteViewed : 6 timesFave It!
Faves for this Web page
So do you need to install the .net 3.5 framework to run .net 3.5 assemblies, or will these assemblies work with .net 2.0?
Quoted: Yesterday I had a discussion on an internal Microsoft Developers meeting about the status of .NET 3.5. We had presented that .NET 3.0 is an extension of .NET 2.0, and not a new version. My statement that the status of .NET 3.5 is the same, it is basically .NET 2.0 with extra features, was received sceptically.
Just to prove I'm right, here my observations.
Already a user? Sign In
Add a Fave for this Web page
- What happens when I press Publish?
- Your Fave for this Web page gets shared with the Faves community. You can access it at any time by selecting "My Faves" from the menu above.
- Why do you ask for my email address?
- We use your email address to create an account, so you can easily find your Fave again at a later time.
Related Content from Around Faves
asp.net
-
1 FaverViewed: 8 TimesQuoted: A chat application demonstrating a reusable API for COMET and ASP.NET (following on from a previous article).; Author: James Simpson; Section: ASP.NET; Chapter: Web Development
- SharpSmith - Jul 15 20081 FaverViewed: 6 Times
- SharpSmith - Jul 15 20081 FaverViewed: 4 Times