SitePoint Blogs » Did Rails Sink Twitter?First Faved : Jun 06 2008 by vanessafoxFaved : 1 time with noteViewed : 24 timesFave It!
Faves for this Web page
- vanessafox - Jun 06 2008 | ruby on rails, scalability
This isn't the first time I've heard this...
Already a user? Sign In
Add a Fave for this Web page
- What happens when I press Publish?
- Your Fave for this Web page gets shared with the Faves community. You can access it at any time by selecting "My Faves" from the menu above.
- Why do you ask for my email address?
- We use your email address to create an account, so you can easily find your Fave again at a later time.
Related Content from Around Faves
scalability
-
2 FaversViewed: 4 TimesQuoted: A component is a trusted piece of an XMPP server that can send and receive arbitrary stanzas. Components speak a different protocol to communicate with the server. Because the name of a component is a domain (example: arbiter.chesspark.com), a component can pretend to be many users. Any stanza addressed to user@component.server.com will be delivered to component.server.com no matter what the value is of ‘user’.
- mike - Jan 17 20091 FaverViewed: 3 Times
- mike - Oct 01 20082 FaversViewed: 2 Times
technology
-
1 FaverViewed: 8 TimesQuoted: Google sees HTML5 as a more logical future for Web improvements than its own Gears software. No surprise, given its work on the standard and dislike for plug-ins. Read this blog post by Stephen Shankland on Webware.
- mike - Apr 24 20091 FaverViewed: 21 Times
- shiwani - 16 days ago1 FaverViewed: 13 Times
This is the same dilemma (messaging model vs. CMS model) we had when we were designing the backend for Faves.