Faves for this Web page

  • jigna - Nov 08 2006 | news

    oh please!

    re-dotting eric

    Quoted: Today, he announced Rumsfeld is resigning and being replaced by former CIA Director Robert Gates. At the press conference, Bush said that “the only way to answer that question, and get it on to another question, was to give you [the reporters] that answer.” Bush admitted that he had talked to Rumsfeld about resigning and was actively searching for his replacement at the time.

    • zak.joe - Nov 08 2006

      Yup. I saw the whole thing live (gotta love having to stay home waiting for Comcast to arrive). Anywho, while the President never said, "I lied," he did admit that he didn't want to tell the reporters about searching for a replacement during the election period.

      Either way, this was certainly a step in the right direction, and, yes, about time!

    • sousa - Nov 08 2006

      Fox News ran the headline: "Will Rumsfeld Resignation Silence Bush Critics?" Guess they failed to pick up on the 'bending' of the facts....

    • eric - Nov 08 2006

      I think the point is that there were even more tactful ways to have not lied. He could have said that Rumsfeld had his support for as long as he wanted to stay.

      Instead, he just lied. There is no excuse.

    • zak.joe - Nov 08 2006

      This is true. As all the news analysts agreed, he could (and should) have said it differently.

  • A lie within a lie within a lie. George W. Bush admits to a room of reporters that he lied to them last week about Donald Rumsfeld staying until the end of his term. His answer is complete hornswoggle and illuminates the regard he holds for the truth (i.e. none). What nice Christian values he has...

    Quoted: Today, he announced Rumsfeld is resigning and being replaced by former CIA Director Robert Gates. At the press conference, Bush said that “the only way to answer that question, and get it on to another question, was to give you [the reporters] that answer.” Bush admitted that he had talked to Rumsfeld about resigning and was actively searching for his replacement at the time.

Add a Fave for this Web page

What happens when I press Publish?
Your Fave for this Web page gets shared with the Faves community. You can access it at any time by selecting "My Faves" from the menu above.
Why do you ask for my email address?
We use your email address to create an account, so you can easily find your Fave again at a later time.
Rate It

Separate each email address with a comma.
WE DO NOT SPAM | Please read our privacy policy.

Related Content from Around Faves

news

VIEW ALL

feminism

  • ms.kruse
    yesterday

    This sums up some of my feelings pretty well. And, just as an aside, isn't it a little bit strange that we haven't heard anyone refer to Palin as 'angry' yet? Whenever women are in the spotlight getting seriously fired up about anything they are always referred to as angry. Not so with Palin precisely for the reasons this blog states -- she negates any power she does have in order to seem unintimidating and kowtows to a boys-club-approved brand of "feminism" that isn't feminism at all.

    Quoted: Why does this particular pitbull in lipstick infuriate — and scare us — so viscerally? Why does her very existence make us feel — and act — so ugly? New York Times columnist Judith Warner calls Palin's nomination a "thoroughgoing humiliation for America’s women," because "Palin’s not intimidating, and makes it clear that she’s subordinate to a great man." Palin, who obviously is incredibly ambitious, masks that ambition behind her PTA placard and "folksy" talk. ... What's infuriating, and perhaps rage-inducing, about Palin, is that she has always embodied that perfectly pleasing female archetype, playing by the boys' game with her big guns and moose-murdering, and that she keeps being rewarded for it.

    1 FaverViewed: 4 Times
  • derek - Oct 11 2006
    1 FaverViewed: 4 Times
  • lucidflame - Nov 05 2007
    1 FaverViewed: 9 Times
VIEW ALL