<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://faves.com/xsl/rss.xsl"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0"><channel><bd:feedUrl xmlns:bd="http://faves.com/syndication">http://faves.com/users/DataShare/rss?st=user%3aDataShare++tag%3a%22disciplinary+differences%22tag%3a%22data+management%22</bd:feedUrl><title>Faves: DataShare</title><link>http://faves.com/</link><description>Your community view of the Web.</description><language>en-us</language><pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 07:21:01 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 07:21:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>Faves RSS Generator</generator><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Project StORe: making the connections for research</title><description>&lt;img src="http://i.faves.com/01/7b/781e/4fa1ba5a/842ba3e9cee7d72bed_5.jpg" /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Findings – The paper finds that significant support was expressed for the provision of bi-directional links between source and output repositories, tempered by a limited knowledge of repositories among the survey constituency and the need for reassurance on measures for the protection of data ownership. Diversity in the application of good data management practice is marked both between and within each of the disciplines surveyed, with solutions adopted characterised by a culture of self-sufficiency and the use of repositories driven by practical research requirements. Common areas for improvement have been recognised across the disciplines, notably in the processes described for the assignment of metadata, and opportunities for expert assistance in data management were identified.&lt;br /&gt;Author(s):  Graham Pryor&lt;br /&gt;Journal: OCLC Systems &amp;amp; Services&lt;br /&gt;ISSN: 1065-075X&lt;br /&gt;Year: 2007 Volume: 23 Issue: 1 Page: 70 - 78&lt;br /&gt;DOI: 10.1108/10650750710720775&lt;br /&gt;Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://faves.com/users/DataShare/dot/90945715617"&gt;Comment at Faves&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://faves.com/Out.ashx?u=http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do?contentType=Article&amp;amp;contentId=1593463&amp;amp;d=90945715617&amp;amp;t=data+management,data+sharing,JISC,project,disciplinary+differences,articles,Edinburgh&amp;amp;ls=rss"&gt;View original page&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://faves.com/users/DataShare/dot/90945715617</link><guid isPermaLink="false">50836.90945715617</guid><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:41:55 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>DataShare</dc:creator><dc:subject>data management,data sharing,JISC,project,disciplinary differences,articles,Edinburgh</dc:subject><media:content url="http://i.faves.com/01/7b/781e/4fa1ba5a/842ba3e9cee7d72bed_5.jpg" type="image/jpeg" width="118" height="125" /><media:thumbnail url="http://i.faves.com/01/7b/781e/4fa1ba5a/842ba3e9cee7d72bed_1.jpg" width="28" height="30" /></item></channel></rss>