SharpSmith | Shared With: Everyone - May 12 2007 | statistics, wikipedia, economics, sience, definition
An Amazon employee described the Long Tail as follows: "We sold more books today that didn't sell at all yesterday than we sold today of all the books that did sell yesterday."[4] In the same sense, the user-edited Internet encyclopedia Wikipedia has many low-popularity articles that, collectively, create a higher quantity of demand than a limited number of mainstream articles found in a conventional encyclopedia such as the Encyclopædia Britannica.[5]
The term is derived from the XY graph that is created when charting popularity to inventory. For example, in the graph shown above the total inventory of Wikipedia articles is along the bottom line, while the popularity rating (web page hit statistics) is along the vertical axis. So, for example, the Wikipedia homepage would receive the most views and be on the far left in the green, while this page might be on the far right in the yellow, as would most of Wikipedia's articles. The same could be said for Amazon's book inventory or Netflix's movie inventory. The total volume of low popularity items exceeds the volume of high popularity items.
SharpSmith | Shared With: Everyone - Apr 07 2007 | startups, sience, tendency, AI
Related Content from Around Faves
startups
-
I would say this is accurate.
1 FaverViewed: 12 TimesQuoted: This is a guest post on capitalizing on — vs. countering — the “entrepreneur’s disease” (manic depression) through 4 cyclical stages. This is done by pairing appropriate activities to specific — though not necessarily positive — emotional states…
- mohit - 14 days ago2 FaversViewed: 2 Times
- mohit - 13 days ago1 FaverViewed: 5 Times
ai
-
by Nick Bostrom, Director, Future of Humanity Institute, Oxford University. Great job title!
Quoted: This paper argues that at least one of the following propositions is true:
(1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage;
(2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof);
(3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation.
6 FaversViewed: 14 TimesQuoted: It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation. A number of other consequences of this result are also discussed.
- neufelry - Jan 04 20081 FaverViewed: 3 Times
- comuneo - Dec 15 20062 FaversViewed: 5 Times

