brad | Shared With: Everyone - Aug 19 2008 | DIY, calculators, engineering
HP has published schematics and code and debugging information for one of their "next generation" calculators. It's very similar to the HP35s, which I love. The calculator has an ARM processor with built-in flash memory and unpopulated traces already provided on the PC board to add an RS-232 driver for a debugging port.
The HP20b is a better product to hack than the HP35s because it costs less and has less keys - easier to make useful changes to.
Bravo, HP!
brad | Shared With: Everyone - Aug 05 2008 | engineering, science, calculators, computers
I love-love-love my new HP calculator. I haven't felt this way abaout a piece of engineering kit since I got my HP25C more than 30 years ago.
In my opinion, the HP 35s is the first calculator HP's made since the 41CV that's worthy of the name. A whole lotta love for $60!
Quoted: Amazon.com: HP 35s Scientific Calculator: Electronics

brad | Shared With: Everyone - Jul 09 2008 | science, engineering, books, periodicals
brad | Shared With: Everyone - Dec 20 2007 | dsp, tutorials, education, engineering
brad | Shared With: Everyone - Dec 20 2007 | dsp, filter, engineering
brad | Shared With: Everyone - Dec 19 2007 | filter, engineering, paia, audio
brad | Shared With: Everyone - Nov 29 2007 | DIY, engineering
brad | Shared With: Everyone - Oct 24 2007 | science, engineering, InnovationFrom an editorial in the San Jose Mercury News by a couple of university professors.
Quoted: The next wave of high-value products will require assembly at the micro and nano scales, where manual labor is no longer an option. These trends suggest enormous opportunities.
brad | Shared With: Everyone - Sep 14 2007 | IC, design, engineeringIncludes a detailed discussion and analysis of current practice. PhD Dissertation by Jung-Hoon Chun.
brad | Shared With: Everyone - Aug 14 2007 | future, nanotech, engineering, science, todo
From Chris' Dot.
Wired 8.04: Why the future doesn't need us.
The process of developing the underlying techniques is unstoppable because the component benefits are so compelling. The question is, can we regulate how the pieces are put together, perhaps in the same way we now attempt to regulate human genetic research?
I'm fascinated by Hillis and Kurzweil who look at silicon-based transcriptions of their humanity as an option. Even if it's impossible for someone to see its pointlessness, surely they can grasp how their new existence would become obsolete within one processor generation (3 years?). Who would care to upgrade them? Who would protect them from predation by more powerful next-generation H/W & S/W?
Related Content from Around Faves
engineer
-
TEST THE FIT of a Nitro RC Racing Engine:
6 Favers - ClaraSet - 13 days ago6 Favers
- dfedfcfbf - 9 days ago10 Favers


