hknapp | Shared With: Everyone - May 07 2008 | law, politics, business, news, fun
hknapp | Shared With: Everyone - Feb 28 2008 | law, world, media, ethics, deafness, civil rights, reproduction
On April 12, British Deaf people are marching against Clause 14 (4) (9) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill. The clause says that a British couple undergoing IVF *must* discard any deaf embryos, and instead choose a hearing embryo for implantation .
This is problematic for the Deaf community for two reasons: First, it takes away a Deaf couple's right (indeed, any person's right) to raise a Deaf child if they choose to use IVF technology. They view this as discriminatory and in violation of their reproductive rights. Second, and more globally, it opens the door to other frightening embryonic selection practices, such as selection against blacks, gays, or other racial, linguistic, or cultural minorities.
Oddly, IMO, high-ranking British newspapers are spinning this as the Deaf community's desire to have "designer" deaf babies. One might expect them to see the broader implications and take up the cause...but ignorance apparently has the day.
hknapp | Shared With: Everyone - Feb 01 2008 | law, technology
hknapp | Shared With: Everyone - Oct 17 2007 | science, technology, law, ethics
hknapp | Shared With: Everyone - Oct 17 2007 | law, science
Quoted:New York, October 9, 2007 – The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation is bringing together a distinguished group of scientists, legal scholars, jurists, and philosophers from across the country to help integrate new developments in neuroscience into the U.S. legal system. The Law and Neuroscience Project is the first systematic effort to bridge the fields of law and science in considering how courts should deal with new brain-scanning techniques as they apply to matters of law.
hknapp | Shared With: Everyone - Oct 08 2007 | law, science, health
hknapp | Shared With: Everyone - Aug 22 2007 | law, technology, news
hknapp | Shared With: Everyone - Apr 15 2007 | ethics, health, law
hknapp | Shared With: Everyone - Mar 13 2007 | news, law, ethics
hknapp | Shared With: Everyone - Mar 06 2007 | science, health, policy, ethics, law
Related Content from Around Faves
law
-
A very interesting prison litigation story that doesn't involve Johnathan Lee Riches or GITMO.
1 FaverViewed: 2 TimesQuoted: Prisoners sue over Nutraloaf with some regularity, usually arguing either that their due process rights have been violated (because they are served the punitive loaves without a hearing) or that the dish is so disgusting as to make it cruel and unusual and thus a violation of the Eighth Amendment.
- btreloar - 8 days ago1 FaverViewed: 3 Times
- zerohour - 21 days ago2 FaversViewed: 4 Times







