mike | Shared With: Everyone - Feb 05 2007 | wikipedia, spam, censorship
Yet another case of the "Speedy Deletion" problem at Wikipedia.
In the beginning, articles where meant to be created by all, and then spur online debate and coordination to settle into a well written, well balanced article about each subject.
Today, with Wikipedia being one of the most visited sites on the internet, it has drawn many people to create articles where their sole purpose is self-promotion, rather than public education.
In response, Wikipedia has given a large number of people (wikipedians) the authority to delete an article without debate. Contrary to online debates in the past, this "nuclear option" has stifled public discourse and turned many people off of participating in Wikipedia at all.
The battle against spammers is a tough problem. But many feel the pendulum at wikipedia has swung too far into the censorship/authoritarian direction. My biggest concern is that there is no hope to hear other voices on a debated topic, if some people have the ability to unilaterally delete an article (and all it's historical commentary) from the site.
I think a better alternative is to place articles on probation, perhaps preventing Google from indexing them or following their links; and then have a vote about when to promote the article to full public status.
mike | Shared With: Everyone - Jul 09 2006 | china, censorship, firewall
The Great Internet Firewall in China has been a bit of a pain while I am here in China. For one, they indescriminantly block ALL blogger.com access. Google helps them by also refusing to show Chinese users "cached" copies of the web pages from a goole search.
But China does not censor digg.com (nor do they censor Blue Dot). There are a great variety of services where Chinese users can upload their own posts on the internet. Blogger is just one, and it seems a massive overkill to block the whole site with the millions of innocuous blogs there.
I found that I was able to VPN to my corporate network from a Chinese computer, and then circumvent the Chinese Firewall but having all my traffic go through our US-based network. I'm sure chinese dissidents would be able to do the same thing quite easily.
I would hope that China would soon learn that it can't truly control the flow of information, and that it is doing more harm than good in trying to restrict large swaths of internet sites from the Chinese people.
Quoted: The operations of U.S. Internet companies in China is attracting concern in Congress after years of complaints from free speech and human rights advocates about these firms aiding Beijing's ability to censor content. Experts say China is assisted in its censorship efforts by hardware and software provided by many U.S. technology companies, including Cisco Systems, Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft.
mike | Shared With: Everyone - Apr 19 2006 | china, google, censorship
mike | Shared With: Everyone - Apr 19 2006 | china, censorship, google
Related Content from Around Faves
censorship
-
glad to see that verizon backed off! censoring conversation, text or otherwise is ridiculous!
1 FaverViewed: 10 TimesQuoted: Verizon said it would make its mobile network available for a text-message program by Naral Pro-Choice America.
- courosa - Jul 19 20071 FaverViewed: 17 Times
- bdeseattle - Nov 26 20066 FaversViewed: 2 Times
china
-
china has almost completed the installation of what it calls an impenetrable operating system that will work with key government and military servers. That puts them ahead of our government in this department, which is worrisome given that they've already started to hack everything we've got.
Including Berkeley's student records; they harvested 163,000 accounts with personal info. Great....
1 FaverViewed: 10 TimesQuoted: Kylin's existence was disclosed to Congress during recent hearings that included new details on how Beijing is preparing to wage cyberwarfare with Washington.
- mohit - Apr 26 20091 FaverViewed: 12 Times
- cal.clid - Mar 01 20071 FaverViewed: 16 Times


