Permalink
Mike on scrabulous
  • vote
    3
    0 starsmike | Shared With: Everyone - Jan 22 2008 | facebook, scrabble, scrabulous, legal, web 2.0, social
    As Tonight’s Deadline For Scrabulous Shutdown (Or Sale) Looms, Zynga Might Be Next.

    R.I.P. Scrabulous

    Quoted: The saga of Scrabulous is nearing an end. The Facebook version of Scrabble raised the ire of Hasbro and Mattel, which jointly own ...

  • vote
    12
    0 starsmike | Shared With: Everyone - Jan 17 2008 | facebook, scrabulous, scrabble, games, words, puzzles
    Copyright fight may spell curtains for Scrabulous | Seattle Times Newspaper

    What kind of hutzpah do you have to have to release "Scrabulous" which is a direct rip-off of Scrabble (same tile distribution, same board layout, same dictionary).

    I don't know which of these components are are protected by copyright law - it seems reasonable to me that Scrabulous has violated not only copyright but also the trade mark of Hasbro.

    Hasbro cannot protect the "idea" of an anagramming word game. This is an opening to create a "open source game design". We just need a group to create the following components and license under an open source license:

    - Board design
    - Tile distribution
    - Word list
    - Scoring rules

    I recently did an analysis of the tile distribution of Scrabble as compared to a standard corpus of English words. I found these major differences. Of the 98 tiles in Scrabble, it has:

    - Too few H's (should have 6 instead of 2).
    - Too many I's (should have 7 instead of 9).
    - Too few S's (should have 6 instead of 4).
    - Too few T's (should have 9 instead of 6).

1 - 2 of 2 Faves

Related Content from Around Faves

facebook

VIEW ALL

games

VIEW ALL