mohit | Shared With: Everyone - Mar 14 2008 | federer, sampras, tennis, sports, news
Good point..nothing settled.
Quoted: But as far as settling who might be the better of the two, forget about it. Sampras, lacking match play, is now 36 years old and in his sixth year of retirement. Federer, a decade younger, is in the midst of perhaps the worst start of his career.
- mohit | Shared With: Everyone - Mar 14 2008 | tennis, news, sports, federer, sampras
The 26-year old Federer edged the 36-year old Sampras in this exhibition match.
Quoted: "I don't think winning or losing was really the issue tonight," said Federer, who perhaps found it easier to think that way as Monday turned into Tuesday, given that he did come out on top 6-3, 6-7 (4), 7-6 (6). "The winner was tennis. The winner was tennis in America."
ShareViewed: 5 Times - mohit | Shared With: Everyone - Nov 20 2007 | federer, sampras, news, sports, tennis
Sampras started out strong before Federer took over and dominated.
Quoted: Sampras came out fighting, hitting two fierce aces in his first service game and breaking his opponent's serve, before taking a 4-2 lead courtesy of a delightful drop shot.
ShareViewed: 15 Times - mohit | Shared With: Everyone - Jul 05 2006 | news, tennis, sampras, federer, sports
s, I agree with the below quote from Sampras. However, I'm skeptical that Sampras at 34 would be able to come back and be a serious threat.
Quoted: "They're just staying back and Roger is able to move well enough and dictate well enough. With Roger you just have to beat him. You just have to serve well and attack him."
ShareViewed: 16 Times
Send Mohit a friend request or a personal message instead.