Permalink
Latarian Huck-a-hatchet Jackson on Deleuze
  • vote
    4
    0 starsshadowpuppetmaster | Shared With: Everyone - 6 days ago | deleuze, badiou
    La Nature (cours d'Alain Badiou 2000-2001)

    this new Badiou course looks great.

  • vote
    12
    0 starsshadowpuppetmaster | Shared With: Everyone - May 26 2008 | deleuze, the
    Groupe d'etudes constructivistes - Stengers' lecture course on Deleuze + Leibniz

    man i'd LOVE to have the transcripts from this lecture course on Deleuze's Leibniz, and Leibniz himself. that book is mystifying.
    i think i'll try and track them down sometime in the future. i'd love to hear what Stengers had to say about it.

    Quoted: Séminaire: Lecture de Le Pli Le séminaire de lectures 2006/2007 sera consacré à Leibniz et la prise qu’a opérée Deleuze sur Leibniz. Plus précisément nous ...

  • vote
    2
    0 starsshadowpuppetmaster | Shared With: Everyone - Dec 10 2007 | politics, deleuze, blogs

    part 2.
    (see prev dot)

  • vote
    4
    0 starsshadowpuppetmaster | Shared With: Everyone - Dec 10 2007 | politics, deleuze, art

    Shaviro has an interesting 2-part introduction discussion of Ranciere here which i found particularly provocative at points given his bent towards Kant and Deleuze.

  • vote
    16
    0 starsshadowpuppetmaster | Shared With: Everyone - Dec 01 2007 | philosophy, deleuze

    redot from trefoil. this is going to rule.

    Quoted: The Substance of Thought: Critical and Pre-Critical featuring keynote speakers Simon Critchley (The New School for Social Research) and Alberto Toscano (Goldsmiths, University of London) ...

  • vote
    3
    0 starsshadowpuppetmaster | Shared With: Everyone - Oct 31 2007 | research, deleuze, politics
    Event & Decision

    A conference about ontology and politics in light of Deleuze, Whitehead and Badiou. Oliver Feltham, Jeffrey Bell and Bruno Bosteels are going to be lecturing, among many others.

    godammit! why do I always hear about these things too late? i still wanna go really bad though. really....bad....want...to...

    Quoted: event and decision conference

    In this interdisciplinary conference, the philosophies of Badiou, Deleuze, and Whitehead become sites for reflecting on Ontology and Politics in the many fields of its productive presence and novelty: philosophy, cultural studies, social and political theory, art, literature, and religion. How does the concerted call for the event uncover deep questions and directions of thought in the philosophies of Badiou, Deleuze, and Whitehead? How does an “ontology of decision,” an emphasis on event, multiplicity, and becoming change the framework and landscape in which these disciplines operate?

    Lecturers

    1. Jeffrey Bell, Southeastern Louisiana University
    2. Bruno Bosteels, Cornell University
    3. James Bradley, St. John’s, Newfoundland
    4. David Brockman, Southern Methodist University
    5. Justin Clemens, University of Melbourne
    6. Roland Faber, Claremont Graduate University
    7. Oliver Feltham, American University of Paris
    8. Catherine Keller, Drew University
    9. Henry Krips, Claremont Graduate University
    10. Graham Livesey, University of Calgary
    11. Helmut Maaßen, European Society For Process Thought
    12. Keith Robinson, University of South Dakota
    13. James Williams, University of Dundee
    14. Adrian Parr, University of Cincinnati

    Commentators

    1. Philip Clayton, Claremont Graduate University
    2. Anselm Min, Claremont Graduate University
    3. Masahiro Yamada, Claremont Graduate University

    Plenary Address

    1. Marc Redfield, Claremont Graduate University

  • vote
    2
    0 starsshadowpuppetmaster | Shared With: Everyone - Jun 21 2007 | politics, deleuze, philosophy
    Deleuze, Marx and Politics | libcom.org

    WHOA! this looks good. the books is available entirely online, and its on Deleuze and Marx.
    Levi Bryant's said the following about it (i haven't had time to read much of it) :
    "Thoburn’s book on Deleuze and Guattari’s politics–...is well worth the read. The text is characterized by a sobriety, seriousness, and critical attentiveness to actually existing situations that is often lacking in studies of Deleuze (i.e., it doesn’t prattle on about “creating monsters” and speak as if politics simply consists in creating works of art or inventing new perversions). However, more importantly, the text works very closely with the works of Marx, taking up the Marxist question of how one might draw on the potentials haunting actually existing capitalism so as to shift our contemporary socio-political organization. As such, it rises to poses a very serious challenge to a number of criticisms of Deleuze and Guattari such as those found in Zizek, Badiou, and Hallward. This is one of the more exciting books I’ve read on Deleuze in some time."

    Apparently chapter four is missing, but those who are interested can download it from Questia by doing free seven day trial with their service.

  • vote
    3
    0 starsshadowpuppetmaster | Shared With: Everyone - Jun 20 2007 | deleuze, philosophy
    Christian Kerslake Articles on Deleuze « Larval Subjects .

    I'm in a conversation with Levi Bryant about some issues on deleuze. thomas, dan, if you guys were interested in contributing, allz cool wit dat.

  • vote
    1
    0 starsshadowpuppetmaster | Shared With: Everyone - Jun 20 2007 | Deleuze, philosophy, books
    Deleuze and the Unconscious - Christian Kerslake

    this is out now. I have a copy but I haven't had time to read it all yet. it looks fairly provocative though.
    I'm still waiting for his forthcoming book on Deleuze and Post-Kantian philosophy, which his dissertation was on. that one should haul ass if he ever gets his ass together to put it out.

    Quoted: Buy Deleuze and the Unconscious at Eden.co.uk Christian Bookshop

  • vote
    1
    0 starsshadowpuppetmaster | Shared With: Everyone - Jun 10 2007 | philosophy, Deleuze

    a very lucid and clear statement about what Deleuzian philosophy cares about and should be up to (even though maybe it isn't enough these days). his impatiences are probably familiar to most who have read this stuff for a while, and his insistence on the rigorous description of multiplicity is dead right.

    for introductory value and for general spin of Deleuzian thought, I couldn't agree more or say it better. and the whole post is done with the resources of D&R. double amen for that.

1 - 10 of 10 Faves

Related Content from Around Faves

philosophy

VIEW ALL

politics

VIEW ALL