• vote
    3
    0 starssrainier | Shared With: Everyone - Sep 23 2008 | on, world, people
    Naomi Wolf: The Battle Plan II: Sarah "Evita" Palin, the Muse of the Coming Police State

    Quoted: Please understand what you are looking at when you look at Sarah "Evita" Palin. You are looking at the designated muse of the coming American police state.

    Totally alarmist. Totally justified.

    Quoted: I realized early on with horror what I was seeing in Governor Palin: the continuation of the Rove-Cheney cabal, but this time without restraints. I heard her echo Bush 2000 soundbites ("the heart of America is on display") and realized Bush's speechwriters were writing her -- not McCain's -- speeches. I heard her tell George Bush's lies -- not McCain's -- to the American people, linking 9/11 to Iraq. I heard her make fun of Barack Obama for wanting to prevent the torture of prisoners -- this is Rove-Cheney's enthusiastic S and M, not McCain's, who, though he shamefully colluded in the 2006 Military Tribunals Act, is also a former prisoner of war and wrote an eloquent Newsweek piece in 2005 opposing torture. I saw that she was even styled by the same skillful stylist (neutral lipstick, matte makeup, dark colors) who turned Katharine Harris from a mall rat into a stateswoman and who styles all the women in the Bush orbit --but who does not bother to style Cindy McCain.

    Quoted: Then I saw and heard more. Palin is embracing lawlessness in defying Alaskan Legislature subpoenas --this is what Rove-Cheney, and not McCain, believe in doing. She uses mafia tactics against critics, like the police commissioner who was railroaded for opposing handguns in Alaskan battered women's shelters -- Rove's style, not McCain's. I realized what I was seeing.

    Quoted: Reports confirmed my suspicions: Palin, not McCain, is the FrankenBarbie of the Rove-Cheney cabal. The strategy became clear. Time magazine reported that Rove is "dialed in" to the McCain campaign. Rove's protégé Steve Schmidt is now campaign manager. And Politico reported that Rove was heavily involved in McCain's vice presidential selection. Finally a new report shows that there are dozens of Bush and Rove operatives surrounding Sarah Palin and orchestrating her every move.

    Showing 1 - 3 of 3 comments
    • akabagel - Sep 24 2008

      Yeah, it's scary. I'm solidly a 3rd party supporter - I don't really care to choose between Obama and McCain. They both have too many things I don't like. But when you throw Palin in there, and the fact that McCain is so old, it's like 'oh shit! please don't let them win!'. I would rather have Bush be president for four more years then Palin.

    • srainier - Sep 24 2008

      Well, the point of that post is that Palin will essentially be the same as Bush - a propped-up leader of a greater (corrupt) conservative movement.

      The conservative movement is incredibly powerful, largely because their sole purpose is to acquire more power.

      Don't kid yourself about this election being McCain vs. Obama, or McCain-Palin vs. Obama-Biden. This presidential election is about pushing the conservative movement out of the executive branch. In the past eight years they've consolidated power in the executive (along with storing some in the supreme court) such that the president is now dangerously powerful and they've put all of their eggs in the McCain basket for 2008, as congressional majorities for them are largely a lost cause.

      With the benefit of hindsight it's no accident that we've ended up where we are today. This movement started with Richard "If the president does it then it's legal" Nixon, accelerated with Reagan, and reached it's peak under Bush 43, where it controlled both houses of congress and the presidency for the first time. And where are we at now? The federal government is slowly being dismantled, except that spending isn't reduced because once-government functions are being outsourced with no-bid contracts that end up costing us more than the original government program did. Trickle-down economics is a joke. Civil rights are continuously violated. This is a corrupt movement that is dangerously powerful.

      So, with your vote for president, you have three choices:
      1. Vote for McCain. God help us.
      2. Vote 3rd party, or abstain. Again, don't kid yourself, they're literally the same in this presidential election.
      3. Vote for Obama, a vote that will actually count towards defeating the conservative movement.

    • akabagel - Sep 25 2008

      I disagree that voting for a 3rd party is the same as abstaining. I am not foolish; I know that a 3rd party is not going to be elected. However, the more support the 3rd parties get the more power they have to influence the two primary parties.

      I am sick and tired of everyone who says to vote for the 'lesser of two evils'. This is a democracy; we should vote for what we believe in, regardless. If what you believe is that the conservative movement must be defeated at any cost, then yeah, vote Obama.

    You must be Shane's friend before you can comment on this Fave.
    Send Shane a friend request or a personal message instead.

Related Faves from srainier

  • vote
    8
    0 starssrainier | Shared With: Everyone - Oct 17 2008 | world, on, people
    About the work - Paul Krugman - Op-Ed Columnist  - New York Times Blog

    What Krugman got his Nobel for...

    Quoted: Really, I don’t want to talk about me when the world is melting down, but I have had a number of requests for an informal explanation of what I got you-know-what for. So here’s an attempt.

  • vote
    4
    0 starssrainier | Shared With: Everyone - Jul 21 2008 | on, iraq, world
    Think Progress » McCain Warns Of ‘Hard Struggle’ On The ‘Iraq-Pakistan Border’

    Oops. Yet another foreign policy 'senior moment'.

    Quoted: He warned of a “very hard struggle, particularly given the situation on the Iraq-Pakistan border.” ... Of course, Iraq is nowhere near Pakistan. In fact, Baghdad — the capital of Iraq — is over 1,500 miles from Pakistan’s capital of Islamabad:

  • vote
    4
    0 starssrainier | Shared With: Everyone - Jun 24 2008 | on, bush, world
    More Bellicose Than Bush? | The American Prospect

    Quoted: In May of 2006, as Iraq spiraled down into an orgy of sectarian bloodletting, John McCain had a solution. "One of the things I would do if I were president," McCain told a group of wealthy contributors, "would be to sit the Shiites and the Sunnis down and say, 'Stop the bullshit.'" If only someone had thought of that before.

    What does that remind me of.... of yeah: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMmtOfBcJ4A

  • vote
    4
    0 starssrainier | Shared With: Everyone - Jun 18 2008 | on, british, world
    ESPN - Woods set to have season-ending knee surgery - Golf

    Dude won the US Open with a busted ACL and two stress fractures. Ridiculous.

    Quoted: Woods said on his Web site that he will have surgery on his anterior cruciate ligament. He also wrote that he needs time to rehabilitate a double stress fracture of his left tibia, which he said was discovered just before the Memorial Tournament in late May.

  • vote
    2
    0 starssrainier | Shared With: Everyone - Jun 12 2008 | on, world, time
    Buffett's bet: Hedge funds can't beat the market - Jun. 9, 2008

    Quoted: Will a collection of hedge funds, carefully selected by experts, return more to investors over the next 10 years than the S&P 500? That question is now the subject of a bet between Warren Buffett, the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, and Protégé Partners LLC, a New York City money management firm that runs funds of hedge funds - in other words, a firm whose existence rests on its ability to put its clients' money into the best hedge funds and keep it out of the underperformers.

  • vote
    4
    0 starssrainier | Shared With: Everyone - May 23 2008 | on, people, world
    Shitterton: The village that dare not speak its name - The Independent

    Named because its people shit a ton. Literally.

    Quoted: This isn't the only place in Britain proudly to wear the Shit– prefix – an unholy trinity is formed with Shittlehope and Shitlington Crags, both in the North-east of England – but Shitterton is the only one of the three actually to be named after excrement. According to the mathematician Keith Briggs, who keeps an informative website on this burning topic, the name is probably derived from a river called Shiter, "a brook used as a privy".

  • vote
    6
    0 starssrainier | Shared With: Everyone - May 16 2008 | on, california, world
    California Building 220 MPH High-Speed Train from San Francisco to LA : Gas 2.0

    This will be awesome.... when I'm retired.

    Quoted: That dream appears to be coming true, thanks to work by the California High-Speed Rail Authority. After getting a green light by State environmental impact assessors, they’ve begun implementation of an 800-mile bullet-train system that will connect Sacramento, the San Francisco Bay Area, the Central Valley, Los Angeles, the Inland Empire, Orange County and San Diego. Trains traveling at 220 mph on the systems are forecast to carry up to 100 million passengers per year by 2030.

  • vote
    2
    0 starssrainier | Shared With: Everyone - Apr 24 2008 | on, world, washington
    TPMCafe | Talking Points Memo | The Syria Nukes Narrative

    Quoted: More fundamentally though, let's imagine these reports are absolutely true -- and Syria was getting North Korea assistance to build a nuclear plant and ultimately a bomb.

    Quoted: This would affect the entire strategic profile of the Middle East -- and would really unleash Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey who would not be able to avoid the requirement of also having a warhead program.

    Quoted: If a nation like Syria, emulating North Korea, was trying to acquire the bomb -- then it means that the bar for acquisition is far lower than most had believed credible. Israel's 200 warheads become an important part of the picture as Israel alone enjoys a nuclear, massive retaliation monopoly in the Middle East -- and this fact may be driving rival states to decide that they need covertly to acquire nukes to balance Israel's portfolio.

    Quoted: This is a huge problem, not easily solved.

  • vote
    2
    0 starssrainier | Shared With: Everyone - Apr 24 2008 | on, world
    Talking Points Memo | Hitting Us Where It Hurts

    No, the Iraq war hasn't lost us any credibility among governments around the world. Not at all.

    Quoted: Syrian Ambassador Imad Moustapha yesterday angrily denounced the U.S. and Israeli assertions. "If they show a video, remember that the U.S. went to the U.N. Security Council and displayed evidence and images about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. I hope the American people will not be as gullible this time around," he said.