Permalink
Zachary on google and drupal
  • vote
    4
    4 starszzelinski | Shared With: Everyone - May 19 2008 | google, drupal
    TinyMCE 3 - anyone installed the new TinyMCE 3.0 release? | drupal.org

    We are having this issue with our site right now -- when I include Google Maps embeddable code, it saves and works but will not let me edit it again.

    This fix should work...we'll see.

1 - 1 of 1 Faves

Related Content from Around Faves

google

VIEW ALL

drupal

  • mike
    Mar 27 2008

    Chris sent mail about this to the local Drupal Users Group a couple of days ago. Since I'm just learning Drupal now, I can definitely see a need for an integrated installer.

    Drupal is excellent in it's modularity. The problem is, the core installation does very little. I'm up to about 20 installed modules on StartPad.org, and it's still a very basic site.

    For example, here's the list of modules I've had to install (and why):

    acl - basic user access control
    adminrole - helper to give an administrator role permissions
    cck - define custom content types
    cck_address - a custom mailing address field type
    cck_field_perms - set field level permissions
    cck_map - display google map field
    contemplate - custom formatting of content types
    content_access - access control by content type
    diff - display revision differences (wiki style)
    forum_access - access control for forums
    globalredirect - redirect (301) to canonical url aliases
    google_analytics - insert google analytics
    image - image upload
    imce - rich text image upload
    link - url field type
    path_redirect - enable url aliases
    pathauto - auto-generate alias (slug text)
    tinymce - rich text editor
    token - utility dictionary for other modules
    views - generate custom views and filters

    There is really no reason that these are not packaged together as "core" - except you'd get some disagreement in the community about what to include (different rich editors, for example).

    Drupal is an interesting start for a base. But I wonder why not start with Ruby/Rails/Radiant or Python/Django/Ellington. You've got to believe that PHP's days are numbered as a preferred platform choice. I can think of two reason FOR Drupal:

    a) There's not a big community behind a single CMS based on those platforms.
    b) This is more of a design/integration project, rather than a development project.

    Quoted: Chris Pirillo has announced a new, large scale open source CMS project that aims to de-geekify website tools (announcement video above). The project ...

    http://chris.pirillo.com/2008/03/26/were-taking-an-open-direction-with-web-communities-are-you-in/

    1 FaverViewed: 3 Times
  • geekglue - Aug 04 2008
    1 FaverViewed: 2 Times
  • mike - Jun 20 2008
    1 FaverViewed: 2 Times
VIEW ALL